Why the most important internet law is being rewritten

3 mar. 2021
72 164 Vizionare

US lawmakers want to change Section 230, a pivotal moderation clause that’s often called the internet’s most important law. But critics say that changing Section 230 could cause more problems than it solves.
Learn more: bit.ly/3uZ0RVw
Subscribe: goo.gl/G5RXGs
Like The Verge on Facebook: goo.gl/2P1aGc
Follow on Twitter: goo.gl/XTWX61
Follow on Instagram: goo.gl/7ZeLvX
The Vergecast Podcast: pod.link/430333725
More about our podcasts: www.theverge.com/podcasts
Read More: www.theverge.com
Community guidelines: bit.ly/2D0hlAv
Wallpapers from The Verge: bit.ly/2xQXYJr
Subscribe to Verge Science on ROlabel, a new home base for our explorations into the future of science: bit.ly/2FqJZMl

Comentarii
  • How do you think the internet could be improved?

    The VergeThe VergeAcum lună
    • I think one of THE biggest issues is dealing with misinformation. I don't know what legislation could be enacted to mitigate or fix the issue, but that's my input.

      Albert JackinsonAlbert JackinsonAcum lună
    • Eliminate internet and force people to rediscover life and become human again technology social media and internet has ruined the world time to reset life before it's to late 😁

      JayJ_The_ CreekerManJayJ_The_ CreekerManAcum lună
    • @Corey Malachi uwu

      HimHimAcum lună
    • Get rid of Facebook, reduce the data collection and generally improve the privacy and security for everyone.

      Liam O'DonnellLiam O'DonnellAcum lună
    • Idk, but not by having a puppet of a president. Along with media not being controlled to say "orange man bad" and to have trump removed from office cause they brainwashed the people in the middle of the road to be dem.

      The Brawl BoysThe Brawl BoysAcum lună
  • Well, the social media ONLY censors right wing people. We all know this, and I'm a centrist

    Bryan PachecoBryan PachecoAcum 10 Zile
  • Klobuchar: Look at these huge potatoes they sent me, this is the real problem! Amy, why are you complaining? if anything getting bigger potatoes is a good thing. Especially if you paid the same price as normal potatoes.

    Storm TrooperStorm TrooperAcum 29 Zile
  • This report is very biased. Why not diversify the interviewees? why do they always choose people who only reinforce their opinion? Why, instead of reporting the criticisms from the point of view of the presenter, do not call on people who are injured by the Legislation to speak for themselves? The impression that remains is that they do not want to seriously debate the issue.

    Edpo VeronezEdpo VeronezAcum lună
  • the most important aspect for me is the privacy, for example it's very common now to upload your files and data on the internet. Personally I do it in descentralized cloud storages such as Internxt Drive because I know they are secure and they respect my privacy but there are plenty of others that don't do it and people should be aware of it

    Crypto.addictCrypto.addictAcum lună
  • So basically you have a pipe spewing raw sewage on everyone so you go to the source and they tell you they just own the pipe and if you make them take responsibility their model doesn't work so go talk to the people flushing their toilets, regulating a business is not violating the first ammendment

    Sean GelardenSean GelardenAcum lună
    • If the government forces a private entity to host and associate with speech they don't want that would violate the 1st amendment. The government can't compel someone to express a certain view.

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
  • 😜

    Gold FormationGold FormationAcum lună
  • Nicely done overall, a bit overly simplistic and you failed to mention the bigger issue with social media. The C word, censorship, the fact that the largest tech companies are been engaging in editing and suppressing content based on whether or not it aligns with their political views, not “in good faith” as specified in section 230. Big tech’s abuse of this alone should pierce the veil of protection that 230 gives.I agree that 230 was written without knowledge of where the Internet and social media was headed. It was written in order to give early content providers and the Internet room to grow and expand organically without being overwhelmed with litigation. Well it worked and now big tech has grown into a cancer. A cancer that has metastasize and now reaches into almost every aspect of our lives. Section 230 should be thrown out and completely rewritten. That along with the repeal of the Smith Mundt act of 2012 would be a good start in fixing these rapidly growing problems.

    Richard CiottiRichard CiottiAcum lună
    • You're assuming that "good faith" means without any type of bias in regard to viewpoint, but that's not how it's ever been interpreted. I could make a forum specifically for conservatives and ban anyone with a liberal viewpoint and I'd still have section 230 protections.

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
  • Excuse me, but when a POPULAR magazine, with ZERO stated credentials, starts an article with "what conservatives got wrong" about a complex LEGAL issue and history, lumping together a vast army of lawyers and politicians with more knowledge and experience in their respective little fingers into a single flimsy stereotype, WHO DO THEY THINK TAKES THEM SERIOUSLY. Bueller? Bueller?? PLEASE tell me I'm not the only one...

    Ellen MarchEllen MarchAcum lună
  • The brace

    PaposePaposeAcum lună
  • Imagine censoring a current sitting president 🤡 clowns

    Rudy MRudy MAcum lună
  • We need an internet with freedom of speech for EVERYONE

    Rudy MRudy MAcum lună
  • Thanks Verge. This was some great nutritious information

    Metacognition88Metacognition88Acum lună
  • Mundane

    FranFranAcum lună
  • The problem is that there is only one side that is providing the definitions of what is considered "problematic content"... For example, right now someone hearing, reading, seeing something they don't agree with can be considered "harassment"... Who gets to define "harm"? who gets to define "hate speech"?

    Aaron SchramAaron SchramAcum lună
  • I don't think section 230 should be modified. I don't think government should tell a company what to do. With that said the predatory EULA and contracts between companies should be reviewed as there are significant issues.

    Jeremy HJeremy HAcum lună
  • If I host a site on a boat in the middle of the Atlantic which country's laws do I need to follow?

    TheAstronomyDudeTheAstronomyDudeAcum lună
    • If you're paying for hosting, then the country the web service is based in. If not then the guys who regulate the domain suffix(.com etc) can deplatform you. Also there's an organization that regulates every dns entry or something, that's how they make it difficult for people to visit terrorist groups' websites

      Elvin deSouzaElvin deSouzaAcum lună
  • Censoring people is not fixing some thing. Just cause you don’t like others opinions doesn’t mean you get to stop them from talking.

    TheelysiumTheelysiumAcum lună
    • You can if they're talking on the website that you made.

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
  • Where is my 2600 fast mhz boy

    diego jimendzdiego jimendzAcum lună
  • Do not touch the freaking internet!! One of the best inventions of our time, destroyed by lawmakers that do not understand it on any technical capacity...

    Ben XBen XAcum lună
  • This is US centric. Section 230 is irrelevant to me in the UK. What needs to happen is the same internet laws across the board.

    m4tt3m50nm4tt3m50nAcum lună
  • How do you do this and keep accounts anonymous?

    Tech4nowTech4nowAcum lună
  • I think you misrepresented the point of conservatives. They’re not against platforms deleting posts or suspending accounts; they’re against them doing so selectively, and in a biased manner. Their argument is that if they pick and choose which voices get promoted based on their own political biases, then they’re a publishing company and not a platform.

    ArmoterraArmoterraAcum lună
    • But section 230 does not care whether you’re a publisher or platform. It’s about third party users vs not third party users.

      Frankie LFrankie LAcum lună
    • @Steve Wonderbelt Again, whether the stance is valid or not is not my point.

      ArmoterraArmoterraAcum lună
    • @Armoterra It seems like there really isn't a consistent stance on this from either side. Conservatives seem to have different opinions on what the issue is and how to fix it, as do Liberals. Many conservative politicians have introduced legislation that would penalize platforms for moderating anything at all while others don't have an issue with moderation they just want it to be more "fair" while still others don't care about moderation they just think these platforms are breaking anti-trust laws.

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
    • @Steve Wonderbelt Yes, but their viewpoint is that those biases would be evenly spread if it were a fair system. If you had both conservative and liberal employees, without discriminating against the conservatives, you probably wouldn’t have that problem (you’d have biases, but not over-represented on one side, and outstanding situations can be handled on a case-by-case basis). However, the point is that there is significant evidence for company-wide policies to incorporate such biases that favour viewpoints of the political Left. Reasonable persons with politically Right viewpoints will be banned for expressing their opinion when extremist, harmful persons go unnoticed simply because they favour the political Left. That’s the position of conservatives, that if you elevate one viewpoint and suppress the other, then you’re no longer a “public forum.” It’s not at all that “they don’t get it” as this video portrays. You can agree or disagree with them, that’s another topic, but if you’re going to represent their viewpoint, do so accurately. All that this video showed is that the Verge doesn’t get it.

      ArmoterraArmoterraAcum lună
    • Every moderation decision is done in a somewhat biased manner though, just because humans are doing the moderating. We can't help but be biased it's just how our brains work. So every platform moderates in a biased way.

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
  • Several years ago I created a FB Group for News and Info for a town I lived in. Now it is Huge. My intend was to run it as an lightly moderated group with a simple set of rules. I have never had a complaint from FB but last year I decide to turn on moderation during the election to try to keep things non-political. Next thing I knew, I got a message from FB that content had been removed from the Group and since it was Moderated, if it happened again they would remove the Group. What a surprise, I quickly disabled Moderation for the Group.

    Mark HancockMark HancockAcum lună
  • If there are laws made like constitution and what is wrong and what is not and their is independent department which governs it. It could be possible that hate speech, violence promoting speeches can be regulated.

    Yash NagdaYash NagdaAcum lună
  • Reform it so I can be back!

    Preśident Donald J. TrumpPreśident Donald J. TrumpAcum lună
    • How's it like having a gimmick account impersonating a shamed president? I'm genuinely interested

      David CazaresDavid CazaresAcum lună
  • This is the best video the verge has made in a while

    adudeisthebombadudeisthebombAcum lună
  • Props to Adi for being at The Verge for so long now & working on so much hard-hitting journalism. Thank you Adi!

    Mike BatesMike BatesAcum lună
  • Better idea, how about monopoly busting. We had to do this in the past when oil, Ma Bell etc got so big, they were using their size to smash competition. Also, let's not take Google, Facebook etc. word on what's good for us. They are in the business of making money and will use any way they can to destroy competition. BREAK them up and let competition in. These big international companies will always have a reason why we should not touch them, and will use all their resources to convince us they are right.

    TimTimAcum lună
  • This is the verge right? Can you guys let me actually not accept cookies on your site thanks

    ****Acum lună
  • Who makes the rules for the rest of the world?

    naijapikinsnaijapikinsAcum lună
  • A single section for the whole internet meant to guide the same people who require a whole 27 amendments to navigate life albeit imperfect? interesting.

    naijapikinsnaijapikinsAcum lună
  • What's up with that clip with the potato?

    SanFranFan30SanFranFan30Acum lună
  • nicely done video

    horia jmhoria jmAcum lună
  • Why does Cruz say anything at all ? As an African, I’m completely baffled as to how that dude is allowed to do anything.

    The RodestarrThe RodestarrAcum lună
  • I want a story on the Potato!

    Scott JacobsScott JacobsAcum lună
  • The truth these days is labeled as misinformation on social media platforms. These platforms censor and ban one side and let the other side call for genocide and spread actual mis information on their counter parts

    It's ya boi Raid Shadow LegendsIt's ya boi Raid Shadow LegendsAcum lună
  • MSM publishes lies all the time, why should FB, Twitter and Google not get the same protection? 😂😂😂😂

    KMKMAcum lună
  • When a single rule serves multiple purpose, its basically a two edged sword.

    alenn mossesalenn mossesAcum lună
  • Every Internet post should include the digital signature of its author, so that reposting cannot (legally) anonymize the content - social media can easily implement this

    Julius SmithJulius SmithAcum lună
  • *American Internet

    Yatharth IpsumYatharth IpsumAcum lună
  • Some people MUST BE silenced.

    Black TigerBlack TigerAcum lună
  • Are we going to ignore that Amy Klobucar has been getting potatoes the size of her head?

    Daniel RiosDaniel RiosAcum lună
  • I don’t want anything taken down. I’d rather know who is a racist or a crazy person or whatever they are. Just because you don’t allow someone to post something, doesn’t mean they no longer exist. It doesn’t make the problem go away, just keeps me from knowing that the problem exists.

    Raphy MartinezRaphy MartinezAcum lună
    • I agree 👍

      Revatron PrimeRevatron PrimeAcum lună
  • Improve privacy before anything. We know they won’t because that’s how’s these tech giants make their money.

    El TostadoEl TostadoAcum lună
    • @Jean Kumik we have to establish a threshold. Personally, if I search for something on ROlabel and it shows related ads, and those ads follow me to the ROlabel mainpage,I don't mind. But when I search Google for stuff and it shows an effect in recommendations and ads, it feels like a huge breach of privacy. I don't mind certain types of data collection(good faith data collection), but others might be offended by the same

      Elvin deSouzaElvin deSouzaAcum lună
    • @Jean Kumik Rightly said

      FortNite KIDFortNite KIDAcum lună
    • As we're all watching this on a free ad supported platform. Option B is to pay for internet services and have it break into the insanity of Netflix/Hulu/Disney+/HBOGo/CuriosityStream/Nebula/etc

      Jean KumikJean KumikAcum lună
    • its also how you and me enjoy services like email serivce providers for free

      Jerry ShenJerry ShenAcum lună
  • Extremely insightful - thanks! :)

    Kamil KozyraKamil KozyraAcum lună
  • Just stop making laws for everything.

    vrancrasvrancrasAcum lună
  • 2:12 Oh, he's back from Cancun?

    RyukachooRyukachooAcum lună
    • I do not like that man Ted Cruz

      David CazaresDavid CazaresAcum lună
  • lmao ted cruz is a joke

    RestoreTheSnyderVerseRestoreTheSnyderVerseAcum lună
  • They want to go back to the 90s where all the information is controlled. They allowed people to talk and share information freely and they almost got a Hitler so now they want to put the genie back in the bottle.

    WaQbwyAYt5hm HDuQx1lSWaQbwyAYt5hm HDuQx1lSAcum lună
  • Censorship and control from the corrupt governments

    OX MONSTEROX MONSTERAcum lună
    • MAGAT. Get educated.

      Ben GreenwaldBen GreenwaldAcum o Zi
  • That's not the right question,it should be "why do governments interfere ?"

    raw2029raw2029Acum lună
    • We need some type of regulation or else these giants media companies can go on without being checked in any way.

      El TostadoEl TostadoAcum lună
    • What do you mean by interfere? The government is ever present in our lives from the day we're born.

      TylerTylerAcum lună
  • Maybe we wouldn't have such an issue if we would stop using terms like hate speech that have no laws attached to them and have no definition. Hate speech is being leveraged to enforce whatever rule is needed in the moment and has no meaningful value other than "you hurt my feelings". You can't enforce everyone's feelings.

    Dustin ParkerDustin ParkerAcum lună
  • Maybe congress should stop outsourcing crime fighting to big tech and tackle it themselves

    Henry CullenHenry CullenAcum lună
  • *Summary:* let's kill the messenger instead of finding & punishing the true criminal

    Jensen RaylightJensen RaylightAcum lună
  • Politicians are very scared of internet in this polarized world, India has started it and polarized leaders across the world will gather together to curb freedom of any form that doesn't meet there ideology

    TechbasicsTechbasicsAcum lună
  • TL:DR, Conservatives want to get rid of Section 230 altogether thinking it means they will be able to say whatever they want but in reality; it will likely have the opposite effect of sites being much faster to censor people promoting lies and hate speech since the site can be held liable. Democrats want to change the law to make it to where sites that do little to police misinformation can be held liable for the misinformation they spread such as Facebook and Twitter doing little to stop the spread of voting misinformation from the 2020 election, allowing the events to happen that led up to the Capitol riot. There's also the concern that repealing section 230, is purely a political move so that whoever is in power can control social media and the one thing preventing either side from doing it, is section 230.

    walspeedwalspeedAcum lună
  • So glad that India just went ahead and gave social media platforms 36 hrs to remove a post. If not then social media become liable for the content of the Post.

    Nishith JoshiNishith JoshiAcum lună
    • well at least it's not china...

      AsHaltAsHaltAcum lună
  • I like the intention of making internet a better place, but the internet is not just facebook and twitter. These boomers don't know enough about the internet.

    Sweet_RollSweet_RollAcum lună
  • Guaranteed this law will be changed not to get Facebook et al in trouble, but to enact harsh censorship of all dissenting thought and platforms, in most cases it will be small outlets to suffer.

    awannagannafulawannagannafulAcum lună
  • 230 should be removed, Social media become online censorship like China even worst.

    jake liujake liuAcum lună
    • @walspeed they can make a law that mandates free speech on the internet

      JackJackAcum lună
    • @jake liu If they were liable for everything users post I guarantee you couldn't have even made this comment, or at least it would take a very very long time for it to be posted. ROlabel would have to manually review it first because it would be the same as them saying it.

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
    • That is fine, they already doing that.

      jake liujake liuAcum lună
    • You do realize, if 230 is removed, sites will be liable for what their users say, meaning they will likely censor their sites even more since they are liable for what their users say or do.

      walspeedwalspeedAcum lună
  • look everyone its the Verge a top tech company defending 230 how unexpected 😂

    Dus CastDus CastAcum lună
    • They're a media company, and they're already liable for the things they publish. I also don't think this video showed clear-cut support.

      TylerTylerAcum lună
    • If anything they would be against it. They are not a social media website like Facebook or Twitter or ROlabel, which is what this video is posted on...

      Jacob KummerJacob KummerAcum lună
  • The rule 34 is being rewritten?

    Gustavo MatiasGustavo MatiasAcum lună
    • @Yorman Ortiz you lived in a cave or what ?

      konakon TVkonakon TVAcum lună
    • @Deathrobloxian Ikr? its sad they changed the title

      Gustavo MatiasGustavo MatiasAcum lună
    • Wonder how many people in the future replies won't get it.

      DeathrobloxianDeathrobloxianAcum lună
    • @Yorman Ortiz do u even know what rule 34 is 😂

      Govind GoyalGovind GoyalAcum lună
    • No rule 230 is

      Yorman OrtizYorman OrtizAcum lună
  • It's funny, Trump is calling for the law to be repealed, But in fact the law should have been repealed due to Twitter and Facebook not taking action against Trump's transgressions for years

    jaffar1234jaffar1234Acum lună
  • Ahhh we ARE getting close to Cyberpunk universe

    Shrek WazowskiShrek WazowskiAcum lună
  • Social media is the fakest way to get social. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Rip eng

    •Niks•Great•Niks•GreatAcum lună
  • This was actually a really good job, kudos.

    jkelleyrtpjkelleyrtpAcum lună
    • There's so much misinformation and misunderstanding all over the internet about 230, thankfully the verge is one of the rare places that understand what the hell it's about.

      Ehsan KiaEhsan KiaAcum lună
  • The problem is that if you repeal this law, there is a likelihood that the internet will become more censored than ever before, as platforms will not want to be liable with anything questionable posted on their website (with blanket bans of certain content being more likely). If everyone is ok with this - fine, but I fear it is the most likely outcome even though it's an unintended one.

    ErrhkaErrhkaAcum lună
    • @Jinkeez1 Abolishing 230 would *favor* the entrenched big platforms, by making it more difficult for smaller alternatives to compete or even just operate. The video discusses this.

      Jongsun SuhJongsun SuhAcum lună
    • It is a good thing, because companies going into overdrive cracking down on "unwanted speech" will: a) harm their profits b) create tens of millions of forced refugee users (100s of millions globally), which will make alternative platforms, payment systems and server hosts financially feasible.

      AvengerieAvengerieAcum lună
    • @Jinkeez1 But then those most impacted aren't the companies but the end users.

      Package Not DeliveredPackage Not DeliveredAcum lună
    • Tech companies have overstepped their boundaries into outright censorship and thus deserve to have 230 abolished.

      Jinkeez1Jinkeez1Acum lună
    • It's funny how you Americans seem to assume that there is currently no censorship happening. (For example, Facebook is censoring nudity, just as an example.)

      Pascal CostanzaPascal CostanzaAcum lună
  • Boy that word “fix” can be anything from an axe to a nuclear bomb depending on who is wielding it, and I know of precious few if any lawmakers, with the understanding of the nature, nuances, and technology of the internet necessary to “fix” it.

    theloniousMactheloniousMacAcum lună
  • dang them potatoes gurl.

    john pardonjohn pardonAcum lună
    • klob will never not be funny to me

      Liam CollinsLiam CollinsAcum lună
  • Rip

    ashskullzashskullzAcum lună
  • Allow free speech. Let future generations lead the internet. Protect user privacy and security. that's it.

    Luigina TrottaLuigina TrottaAcum lună
    • I like free speech too, but I'm not sure that every place is appropriate for it. If you get invited to a birthday party and run around saying the n-word, you would get kicked out. If you go to someone's facebook page and do it, I think it only makes sense that you could get kicked out of there too. Maybe the answer is to give people more control over the moderation of their pages, but full freedom of speech with no repercussions doesn't match our experience in physical life. Freedom of speech means the government can't limit your speech, not that individuals and companies can't treat you differently for it.

      TylerTylerAcum lună
  • Well there is always deep web

    Phantom66GamesPhantom66GamesAcum lună
    • you mean the dark web?O.o

      Jerry ShenJerry ShenAcum lună
  • Did I just witnessed a 8 minute rant AGAINST freedom of speech?

    ziguirayouziguirayouAcum lună
    • Why is arguing against repealing section 230 ranting against freedom of speech?

      Steve WonderbeltSteve WonderbeltAcum lună
    • Yes, yes you did. Sad how these people are so brainwashed and have zero idea how communism creeps in.

      An AudioslaveAn AudioslaveAcum lună
  • Fix her potatoes!

    IvanRSaldiasIvanRSaldiasAcum lună
    • face?

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
  • Personally, I dont like how these rules affect us in the rest of the world

    TempestuousDTempestuousDAcum lună
    • @SR Productions yeah the US shouldn't be theory country to control the internet

      Revatron PrimeRevatron PrimeAcum lună
    • @SR Productions Internally in the US it’s being argued because people believe the US constitution should apply online. Unfortunately these platforms are now global and this could be an issue.

      Dus CastDus CastAcum lună
    • Agreed..the US has too much power over other countries and is becoming monopolistic of its power

      SR ProductionsSR ProductionsAcum lună
    • you must be living in a cave

      RestoreTheSnyderVerseRestoreTheSnyderVerseAcum lună
    • US sets the precedence

      LET4LET4Acum lună
  • boomers making rules about the internet.

    MABinMABinAcum lună
    • @analogdistortion ok boom kid hoooooo didn't see that COMING, _DID YA????_

      BroAnarchyBroAnarchyAcum lună
    • @theloniousMac and what's more, most of the isms and hate etc is just people trying to annoy and troll and trigger the progressive weirdos for a laugh

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
    • We made the Internet, and it was a much nicer place until after the post boomer generations came along. Oh we had our arguments on USENET, private bulletin boards, Compuserve, Genie, AOL, and others, but it wasn’t the cesspool of palpable hatred it has become. We had this tendency to pick apart ideas instead of off the cuff meaningless attacks on groups of people.

      theloniousMactheloniousMacAcum lună
    • @Darth Plagus tee hee

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
    • @analogdistortion ok boomer

      Darth PlagusDarth PlagusAcum lună
  • Every time I see Ted Cruz I throw up in my mouth

    Wil C-137Wil C-137Acum lună
  • Ugh let congress deal with wars and health care, leave the internet to the internet.

    Brace110Brace110Acum lună
    • Where do you think war happens these days?

      Katzelle3Katzelle3Acum lună
  • Wow seeing the internet get regulated throughout the years has been so interesting, like laws being passed on it and it changing due to those laws . Also just how people that are born now will have such a different experience then I ever did or will as they grow with the internet.

    omar velasquezomar velasquezAcum lună
    • @Nabil Silva Yeah so it's best to leave it alone

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
    • @analogdistortion Any regulation would always favor big corps, since they have the most resources to spend to comply with the regulations and scale at the same time.

      Nabil SilvaNabil SilvaAcum lună
    • Lol, I feel like we are in the 80s of the internet, like the coke wave in the 80s

      Elements The ProducerElements The ProducerAcum lună
    • Funny how they're always in favour of the big corperations. The law I mean, but yes of course, Democrats too.

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
  • This is a nuanced problems and congress are far to tech illiterate to deal with them , this will not go well

    Christian RisoliChristian RisoliAcum lună
    • @Darth Plagus You really assume everyone for free speech is like that or are you joking? There's a large minority of freaks that somehow would think like that ya know?

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
    • @analogdistortion repealing 230 will strip freedoms from the little man and create an even more policed internet. All your Q and Stormfront friends will be silenced more aggressively.

      Darth PlagusDarth PlagusAcum lună
    • So the big corperations win control against the little man once again. Thanks Democrats.

      analogdistortionanalogdistortionAcum lună
  • Only 5 views in 7 minutes?

    Dennis Brännvall’s #1 FanDennis Brännvall’s #1 FanAcum lună
    • The Verge reappear in my subscription, strange problem with the algorithm of ROlabel. I was sure that there over

      M DM DAcum lună
  • Former president obama

    THETRUTHofYOUTUBETHETRUTHofYOUTUBEAcum lună
    • Obama was a populist weakling,did nothing positive and bombarded middle east.

      Српски патриотаСрпски патриотаAcum lună
    • even when someone has stopped being the president you still call them the president

      Orien DayOrien DayAcum lună
    • @Josh Witte FORMER best president obama

      THETRUTHofYOUTUBETHETRUTHofYOUTUBEAcum lună
    • "Best President in History Obama"

      Josh WitteJosh WitteAcum lună
  • Congrats To" Everyone' Who is Early And who..found this 🍩.....!!

    Help Me Reach 10k With SubsHelp Me Reach 10k With SubsAcum lună
    • 🍻

      apeshit clothingapeshit clothingAcum lună
  • Somebody need to be blocked! They deserve this.

    Zizhang ChengZizhang ChengAcum lună
  • Better to be No Internet

    अंशुमान मिश्र Anshúmân Mishrãअंशुमान मिश्र Anshúmân MishrãAcum lună
  • Never thought i would see 1 minute ago on a Verge video

    Darius LezamaDarius LezamaAcum lună
  • Security should be put on the forefront then other things can be considered .

    Udit kaushalUdit kaushalAcum lună
  • fun fact: nobody cares your first

    UserUserAcum lună
    • fun fact: . . . . . . . . . . I Do.

      BroAnarchyBroAnarchyAcum lună
  • fun fact: 69 people can't be first...

    UserUserAcum lună
  • 👍🏽

    Vikram PrashanthVikram PrashanthAcum lună
  • First?

    Martin HMartin HAcum lună
ROlabel