What happens when AI stops playing games? [Paid Content for IBM]

6 mai. 2020
481 350 Vizionare

The question, “can a machine be made to think like a person?” has always been tied to strategy games. Games, with their clear rules and obvious winners and losers, were perfect proving grounds for early computer scientists, who could break them down into clearly defined problem sets. Audiences could marvel at the progress of man vs machine face offs, even if they didn’t fully understand the underlying technology.
The earliest AI game systems relied on a brute force, top-down approach: programmers downloaded every possible outcome into their AI systems, which were built around narrowly defined, rule-based criteria. In the 1950s, the earliest versions of neural networks and machine learning arrived. This represented a shift towards bottom-up programming, systems designed to determine the probability of various outcomes based on training data. One early system, a virtual rat solving a maze, was made up of vacuum tubes, motors, and clutches. As the rat navigated, the machine learned and shifted probabilities.
IBM debuted their first AI Grand Challenge - a multi-year effort meant to push the limits of artificial intelligence - in 1997. Deep Blue beat reigning chess world champion Gary Kasparov, and was seen as the final triumph for the top-down approach. In the last decade, advances in machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing paved the way for AIs like Watson on Jeopardy!, AlphaGo, and Dota 2-increasingly complex systems that still existed within the framework of games.
Learn more here - www.theverge.com/ad/21244164/project-debater-film-artificial-intelligence
[Paid Content for IBM]

  • AI for now is just a billion if statements

    Younes MeftahYounes MeftahAcum 6 luni
  • Why are they blurring the IBM laptop logos at 10:03 when the screen and title and EVERYTHING ELSE says IBM?

    EclogitesEclogitesAcum 6 luni
  • Maybe I'm missing something here, but it doesn't seem the debater did a very good job beyond its initial argument.

    Bradley RintoulBradley RintoulAcum 6 luni
  • There goes "free will"...bye bye 👋

    hadror13hadror13Acum 7 luni
  • A new Era

    mohammed alimohammed aliAcum 7 luni
  • If human can create AI that is smarter than human.. Which one is smarter, AI or human?

    Aldo KWAldo KWAcum 7 luni
  • @12:26 ... all they did was pass on the inferiority complex.... made a robot in their image.

    Mike BMike BAcum 7 luni
  • Earthling Ed!!!

    Yarib SuárezYarib SuárezAcum 8 luni
  • MAGI

    Vignette Tsukinose AprilVignette Tsukinose AprilAcum 8 luni
  • I was hesitant to watch this because of the disclaimer that it was paid content (which I read as, hey this is an ad). In hindsight, all content is paid by someone right? I'm really glad I watched this, the length was perfect and it was genuinely interesting and enjoyable to watch. Keep'em coming please!!

    Luis RamosLuis RamosAcum 8 luni
  • Rehoboam from the Westworld series & STEM from the movie Upgrade both come to mind Elon Musk... Eron Keen... Serac... Same guy ;)

    Earn Your ImmortalityEarn Your ImmortalityAcum 8 luni
  • Debating is stupid. There's always a right answer and debating is just one side denying that right answer while the other is trying to make them understand. In situations where you're given a stance if that stance isn't right then there's nothing you can do to win the debate.

    Dan OddenDan OddenAcum 8 luni
  • As cool as this was, this doesnt really show anything. I think we needed at least 2 debates with topics on very different ends of a spectrum. Otherwise, there is no proof that Project Debater is truly flexible like a person can be.

    silverwordsilverwordAcum 8 luni
  • I would love to see Trump and Biden have to argue with this.

    crubscrubsAcum 8 luni
  • Mostly Israeli accents over at IBM I see, not that there’s anything wrong with that, just an observation that’s all.

    SneakerHeadSneakerHeadAcum 8 luni
    • Project Debater was developed at our lab in Haifa, Israel.

      IBM ResearchIBM ResearchAcum 8 luni
  • This can be first stage of A.L.I.E. from the 100 !! Remember her ??

    Techs MacTechs MacAcum 8 luni
  • ai will probably be better than humans when it comes to understanding implications and if not at least help us make quicker decisions

    zer0Botzer0BotAcum 8 luni
  • i can't wait to see both AI debate each other,

    konakon TVkonakon TVAcum 8 luni
    • Actually, we did this at Cambridge last November -- @AvoQ.

      IBM ResearchIBM ResearchAcum 8 luni
  • 10:19 the guy on the right just gave up 😂

    JuanJuanAcum 8 luni
  • Isn't this 2019? Why published now?

    GAMEbuffGAMEbuffAcum 8 luni
    • While the debate featured in the video was recorded in March 2019 we first commercialized the underlying AI just recently. We also wanted to show a few use cases with clients, such as the final shots from Lugano.

      IBM ResearchIBM ResearchAcum 8 luni
  • Skynet happens.

    Saul GoodmanSaul GoodmanAcum 8 luni
  • Music is way too loud. DNF 😞

    Nunya _Nunya _Acum 8 luni
  • If computers will think this way, humans will then be lazy to think on it's own. Good luck in 2050.

    Delon SerinoDelon SerinoAcum 8 luni
  • So how much of this was set up beforehand? Did the algorithm define his starting phase realtime? Was it a random topic? Were there manual decisions to prevent the algorithm from giving a wrong answer? Many many questions.. Would love to get more info but the links to IBM don't give more info.. without it it's just a co-creation ad...

    JeroenJeroenAcum 8 luni
  • whoa.

    Shrey AroraShrey AroraAcum 8 luni
  • Lol @ Java messing up a whole team of machine learning engineers.

    Joe TorbettJoe TorbettAcum 8 luni
  • Beautiful. The benifit of debate is lost in competition. The facts were layed out well by The Project. People understood the issue, and made an informed choice. What use is winning a debate if it's through deception? Which I'm sure Watson is capable of.

    ed eded edAcum 8 luni
  • I heard that IBM is making a better version of the program that argues with itself; they are calling it The Master Debater.

    Peter KambasisPeter KambasisAcum 8 luni
  • "It's fine to disagree, it is not fine not to listen." I'm keeping that one in mind

    Jossely IllescasJossely IllescasAcum 8 luni
  • That's amazing.

    Melchizedek Phuah Siow JinMelchizedek Phuah Siow JinAcum 8 luni
  • Debate is probably a good exercise for an AI, but not its use. Just like for human brain.

    Quantum NewtonQuantum NewtonAcum 8 luni
  • Is the full debate available?

    Haritha JayasingheHaritha JayasingheAcum 8 luni
  • I think the artificial intelligence actually did a better job. There are a few tweaks here and there to make it a little more refined. That being said, I conjecture that it only lost due to the majority of the audience simply showing more empathy toward the human.

    Mahyar MirrashedMahyar MirrashedAcum 8 luni
  • I really don't know bout this one after watching it. It feels like that being a good debater is like making a good movie, is to touch the emotions of the audience. Statements won't make an impact if the audience can't relate with it. Project Debate could be better at reviewing policies than debates.

    zodiacfmlzodiacfmlAcum 8 luni
  • Now let's see if she will explode debating Trump :)

    Thanh Ho VietThanh Ho VietAcum 8 luni
  • A machine that can think for itself?? Absolutely insane. (and idc what the results say, she should’ve won that debate!!)

    Dominic GoDominic GoAcum 8 luni
  • This is scary and I'm not sure why

    Prince PadrinaoPrince PadrinaoAcum 8 luni
  • This new brand of horror sure is terrifying :))

    JimmJimmAcum 8 luni
  • machine: capacity and speed human: original, context, perspective you cannot code for every situation because it changes constantly and does not follow a pattern. humans don't appreciate the ease with which they acquire and contextualize knowledge, with unlimited variables.

    Mariachee BandidosMariachee BandidosAcum 8 luni
  • • 3:48 - Cherry-picked example. What about when Watson answered Toronto for the final-Jeopardy! question in the category of "US Cities" or when it answered chemise for a keyboard key. ¬_¬ • 11:40 - Hmm, I can't tell if it's smart or dangerous. 🤔 • 12:25 - Resorting to ad hominem attacks in a debate? 🤨 It must be losing. • 13:08 - Trying to psyche out the opponent? 🤨 I guess the A.I. really is human. • 13:25 - Is she worried about the audience or can the computer just not keep up? •13:32 - Present your arguments. Yes, I'll gift them alright. The A.I. can't even distinguish homonyms. • 14:03 - Perfect use for A.I.: let the machines debate the conspiracy-theorists instead of wasting humans' time with them. 👍 • 17:50 - People think that debate is beyond an A.I.'s capabilities, but this example shows why it's not; debate essentially just boils down to little more than stating a bunch of facts. It may not be compelling debate, but it's basically what the bones of a debate are. Of course, the _winner_ of a debate is usually the one that makes an emotional argument, not a factual one. • 21:13 - Of course, this isn't a good experiment since the humanness and AIness were known and definitely influenced them.

    --Acum 8 luni
  • Imagine being in court and your opponent whips out Debater 😳

    M. KrabsM. KrabsAcum 8 luni
  • Anyone getting west world vibes? Rehoboam ... lol

    Caleb Mac DonaldCaleb Mac DonaldAcum 8 luni
    • I scrolled down in search of this very comment lol Great minds...

      Earn Your ImmortalityEarn Your ImmortalityAcum 8 luni
  • They made a big hype around it, but the AI was not that good. I mean it was able to create good sentences and points in the debate, but it was too big hype around it. And because IBM paid for the whole thing, I am very skeptical. I would have been absolutely impressed, if I am able to test this thing myself, like download an app, and talk and debate with it myself. Now it’s just a cool video, that might be usable in ten years.

    Piplikoc TutorialsPiplikoc TutorialsAcum 8 luni
  • @earthling Ed you got a feature ♥️ proud of you.

    Hugh FergussonHugh FergussonAcum 8 luni
  • This channel once uploaded a video tutorial of someone incorrectly building a computer, now IBM pay you to advertise A.I. technology. How far this channel has come, how quickly humans forget.

    LouderLouderAcum 8 luni
  • The machine doesn't take Harish's point on psychological damage. It takes only the word "harm" which was said few words later and the machine say"benefits outweigh potential harm" . Harish point on psychological damage is a very strong and correct argument. That machine can't understand the usual or natural psychological development needed for a child. I hope you understand what iam trying to say. But that machine making jokes, thats great

    • This is an ongoing process...no doubt the developers perceive the same complex issue. Debater will need to read a few hundred psychology books & add to its well of perception.

      Sven JuisSven JuisAcum 6 luni
    • I was also kind of unimpressed with the response to the argument given. Seemed pretty lame, really.

      Bradley RintoulBradley RintoulAcum 6 luni
  • IBM is the true innovator

    Karthik GarimellaKarthik GarimellaAcum 8 luni
  • What a video! Keep up with the outstanding work 👍

    Charles AUBERTCharles AUBERTAcum 8 luni
  • I want to see what this AI can do with other debate formats like policy, Lincoln-Douglas, Public Forum, or parliamentary formats. If it can take a wide array of of styles and still understand the arguments it would be a game changer.

    jshukla423jshukla423Acum 8 luni
  • Mandatory minimum sentences make prisons overcrowded and rightfully so 😂

    joshissocool97joshissocool97Acum 8 luni
  • Debates are useless in today's time as per my opinion. Debates are biased nowadays and divides people rather than leading to a conclusion with which most agree with. AI might play a very crucial role here when it comes to delivering unbiased opinions.

    saurav majumdarsaurav majumdarAcum 8 luni
  • Very insightful. Thank you.

    James EckJames EckAcum 8 luni
  • What happens when IBM starts playing mind games? [Monetized Content for AI]

    XerosXIIIXerosXIIIAcum 8 luni
  • The test in the video should not lead people to believe that computers are better at debating than humans or that the guy lost. To truly test the machine, a debate would have to take place where both parties (human & computer) would have to argue both sides to different audiences, and then the data analyzed. Some arguments are going to have bias to them, therefore a debate must be handled by providing equality - allowing both sides to argue each other's side. Most people would probably choose to subsidize preschool before dabating the topic, therefore the uphill battle is debating against subsidizing preschool. Let's make these debates more rigorous to truly test the ability of this IBM project.

    Jimmy GJimmy GAcum 8 luni
    • 100% agree with you .

      Salman Hossain SaifSalman Hossain SaifAcum 8 luni
  • I like the AI’s joking but it also scares me about future sentience 🤣

    Harsh ParmarHarsh ParmarAcum 8 luni
  • The competition: Project Mom. "Because I said so!"

    Darryl GiorsDarryl GiorsAcum 8 luni
  • I wonder when are we going to see ai like Jarvis or Friday

    ricinricinAcum 8 luni
  • Harish (the human debater) seems like a cool dude. Ignoring his obviously sound intellectual capacity, he's charismatic as hell and somehow manages to be so charming without the arrogance one would expect as a side effect..

    Sahan NSahan NAcum 8 luni
  • AI for life-serving President 2020

    Luis Angel SantosLuis Angel SantosAcum 8 luni
  • Meh

  • Why that IBM machine sound so choppy, almost outdated compared to human like speech generate by Google.

    Gino FotoGino FotoAcum 8 luni
  • At last they find the perfect AI is human .

    hjchjcAcum 8 luni
    • for now

      Isaac LutterodtIsaac LutterodtAcum 8 luni
  • I need the machine to argue with my wife

    Lizard GandalfLizard GandalfAcum 8 luni
    • debater will be sleeping on the couch

      Vicente SchmittVicente SchmittAcum 8 luni
  • "Jerusalem, ISRAEL" That was not very cash money of you.

    Some High SchoolerSome High SchoolerAcum 8 luni
  • Ai vs Corona virus

    J PowellJ PowellAcum 8 luni
  • Amazing

    rafael Dimarziorafael DimarzioAcum 8 luni
  • Is it possible watching the complete debate, somewhere?

    Internettipper 01Internettipper 01Acum 8 luni
  • Why.why you're going out during pandemic

    Shyam RudrapatiShyam RudrapatiAcum 8 luni
  • I wonder if this can pass the turing test where people are asked if there is a robot arguing or not in a transcript.

    JoannotJoannotAcum 8 luni
    • No, at least not with our current understanding of Deep Learning. Any models that have "beaten" the Turing Test resort to clever "tricks" such as humor to facade their lack of understanding certain lexical context.

      jimbojimboAcum 8 luni
  • Debating has to be the most boring form of conversation.

    Ben AltairBen AltairAcum 8 luni
    • @Antenox uP

      ADee SHuPAADee SHuPAAcum 8 luni
    • @P Kramer Which is exactly why making it a sport is good. If we keep those topics in the realm of sport and competition, people are more likely to step back and address it objectively rather than invest emotionally. When you bring controversial topics into the real world (i.e. as politics), that's when people get irrational.

      AntenoxAntenoxAcum 8 luni
    • I don't like the "sport" of debating. I don't think that being able to defend every side of an argument is something we should want. It's only going to lead us to accepting morally unacceptable opinions, because technically each side of an argument has something to it. Debating should come out of ones experiences and life, to defend the view they truly believe in.

      P KramerP KramerAcum 8 luni
    • Ben Altair you’re a debater!

      Suomy NonaSuomy NonaAcum 8 luni
    • But also, most informative

      【gamma_ray20XX】【gamma_ray20XX】Acum 8 luni
  • Three isn't supposed to be a winner in a debate. A debate is supposed to be a cooperative process with an outcome that is a compromise that benefits both parties

    SinomSinomAcum 8 luni
  • Anyone who likes this should watch the AlphaGo documentary

    JLCodesJLCodesAcum 8 luni
  • What about two AI fight each other than human fighting AI.

    Abdu CAAbdu CAAcum 8 luni
    • They could literally duplicate Project Debater and make the debate like that. I know it's not that simple but ...

      【gamma_ray20XX】【gamma_ray20XX】Acum 8 luni
  • This is just like Westworld season 3

    Fuz AsimFuz AsimAcum 8 luni
  • Skynet? hahahahahahahaha

    Nassim DjabaNassim DjabaAcum 8 luni
  • Imagine Trump has such an AI helper on his ears. He will definitely sound smarter 😅!

    Kain JaegerKain JaegerAcum 8 luni
  • I wonder how much is hard cider and how much is ai

    Michael MosseriMichael MosseriAcum 8 luni
  • For some reason i remember film good will hunting..

    Soft PastelsSoft PastelsAcum 8 luni
  • Artificial intelligence intrigues me so much, awesome video I look forward to the day they become extremely relatable to us like a best friend !

    Cy ClonesCy ClonesAcum 8 luni
  • bruh..

    Christian SiauwijayaChristian SiauwijayaAcum 8 luni
  • I AM AI

    Truth BitesTruth BitesAcum 8 luni
  • The topic was not easy to debate against. Also what are 4 guys with laptops doing on the stage.

    Shivang AgrawalShivang AgrawalAcum 8 luni
    • @Valentino Lau To check what on the system?

      Shivang AgrawalShivang AgrawalAcum 8 luni
    • Checking on the system than!

      Valentino LauValentino LauAcum 8 luni
  • This is revolutionary

    John Cedrick BaldozaJohn Cedrick BaldozaAcum 8 luni
  • I need such an AI Debater in my life to defend my ideas.

    Shiftert ioioShiftert ioioAcum 8 luni
    • Hexxxplicit Truth problem with AI is it learns from data. With that many empty brains on the internet, AI’s will be effected by that. Especially in a context like a debate

      Samuël VisserSamuël VisserAcum 7 luni
    • I can be your masterdebater

      Chinese SparrowsChinese SparrowsAcum 8 luni
    • @Johann Dirry lol that will be the moment he realizes that AI is more woke then he had anticipated.* 😑 jeeez*""*

      Hexxxplicit TruthHexxxplicit TruthAcum 8 luni
    • what if it tells you how bad your ideas are instead? 😂

      Johann DirryJohann DirryAcum 8 luni
    • Was that* said sarcastically?

      Hexxxplicit TruthHexxxplicit TruthAcum 8 luni
  • Its jokes and sarcasms scares me so much. This achievement is way way more significant than the chess win because at this stage AI almost beat Turing test, except for the speaking tone (still not very human, but it can be fixed soon I think)

    Hai Le QuangHai Le QuangAcum 8 luni
    • Google Duplex has basically resolved the speaking tone issue. Combine these two techs and the Turing test is passed with ease. It's getting fascinating and scary at the same time.

      crubscrubsAcum 8 luni
    • It’s not that impressive it’s like insert insult [here] in the programming and they taught it some insults nothing too crazy

      SneakerHeadSneakerHeadAcum 8 luni
    • @naramoro I think it's just that teaching the AI to write them wasn't the task here. I have no doubt that building an AI that could a slam poetry, for instance, is possible, and even simpler that creating the debator. The real challenge is not the writing, but the decision making progress. Once they'll nail it (and it's getting closer, but not quite there yet), teaching it how to write it's own phrases won't be that complicated task.

      טל מילנרטל מילנרAcum 8 luni
    • @AKU still no word from her,guess I'm entirely alone on this one.

      Hexxxplicit TruthHexxxplicit TruthAcum 8 luni
    • @AKU I'm waiting in to hear back

      Hexxxplicit TruthHexxxplicit TruthAcum 8 luni
  • love the tech content on this channel

    Aut0SomalAut0SomalAcum 8 luni
  • I'm pretty early

    RehanPlayzRehanPlayzAcum 8 luni
  • Imagine having this as an app or something just pulling your phone out to savagely accuse your friend of being stupid

    someonesomeoneAcum 8 luni
    • @OKjoey86 I wonder how an AI is gonna reply to this statement (and others like this one)

      Mikhail PlatinovMikhail PlatinovAcum lună
    • @OKjoey86 Lol

      someonesomeoneAcum 8 luni
    • @Matt Nezbeda bet you're fun at a party

      OKjoey86OKjoey86Acum 8 luni
    • I mean, the second phase to that is that they also pull out their app and have two people listening to robots fight on their behalf... Making both of them look stupid since neither could hold their own against an AI designed to point out fallacies in arguments and statistics. While I see this as being fun in the short term, the scarier part comes down to when you have AI lawyers and prosecutors and judges. Imagine being accused of a murder you did not commit, but circumstantial evidence puts you in a not great position. You get a public attorney, while the state has a prosecutor AI to assist with court processing. In what instance do you see yourself going free against an AI that is literally designed to convince people of a ruling, that can compete with the top humans in the world?

      Matt NezbedaMatt NezbedaAcum 8 luni
  • This is a huge step!

    Enoch 'Robot Boy' Appiah JuniorEnoch 'Robot Boy' Appiah JuniorAcum 8 luni
  • Wait did that dude just say it can do simple things play games ? Playing games is art and not simple

    Blacki GangstaBlacki GangstaAcum 8 luni
    • @LAN Fan damm really like you answer ! thanks for the information

      Blacki GangstaBlacki GangstaAcum 8 luni
    • @LAN Fan are you an AI master debator?

      Hexxxplicit TruthHexxxplicit TruthAcum 8 luni
    • This may be true, but they are simple from a mental processing standpoint. Take chess for example. There is a finite limit on the number of moves that either you or your opponent can make, and your brain is constantly assessing the risk vs reward outcome of any possible move. These are the types of things that computers are very good at, as it essentially comes down to a very complex math equation. Debate requires language processing, knowledge of the topic, circumstantial knowledge of society's relation to the topic, and a knowledge of your audience. It also requires real time responses based on natural language processing, a process that requires an insane amount of mental connections. Yes, games are an art form, but debate and conversation are significantly more complex from a processing standpoint than most games.

      LAN FanLAN FanAcum 8 luni
    • Just a quick search of "TAS plays" is proof enough

      Xavier ZaraXavier ZaraAcum 8 luni
  • sounds like debater is just a bunch of if else statements

    Karlo SchallibaumKarlo SchallibaumAcum 8 luni
  • IBM is back baby!

    AnonymousAnonymousAcum 8 luni
  • The future is now old man

    Shadrack KiemaShadrack KiemaAcum 8 luni
    • Shadrack Kiema more like “the future is now human”.

      spazemonkeyspazemonkeyAcum 8 luni
  • Project debater software.....project insulter program..... We've been having conversations with a no body.

    Hexxxplicit TruthHexxxplicit TruthAcum 8 luni
  • This is terrifying.

    Dominik J.Dominik J.Acum 8 luni
  • how do we know that someone is just not speaking into a microphone

    Sameer RizwanSameer RizwanAcum 8 luni
    • You have a good debate lol

      Cy ClonesCy ClonesAcum 8 luni
    • Wow they really passed the turing test if people are saying this

      seasongseasongAcum 8 luni
  • Others: Let's sneak in the sponsor The Verge: Move Away! PAID F**KING CONTENT on the way MOFOS!

    Bala VigneshBala VigneshAcum 8 luni
  • debates are pointless and resolve nothing . speeches and lectures are good . and then you do research on how right or wrong it was . and on the subject of governments doing good policies means nothing . why . because there capitalist governments ruled by the rich . its not about whats good or bad it about profit .

    bolsh smithbolsh smithAcum 8 luni
    • @bolsh smith if there's nobody contesting points we will never know which points are better, debate is about finding better solution. also i have never met people who rage and throw stuff. people in these types of debate are very composed.

      marmarAcum 8 luni
    • @mar how about instead of talking to the person making the argument to the contrary of yours you just take what they previously said and make your arguments against them point-by-point. But not in a face-to-face debate where y'all end up in a screaming fight. And then the people who watch it can go off and do their own research. How about that ?

      bolsh smithbolsh smithAcum 8 luni
    • @mar it depends whose speaking , like Donald trump make speeches with no arguments 🤷🏼‍♂️😬

      King KazmaKing KazmaAcum 8 luni
    • honestly speeches at its core are arguments, debate is basically cramming 3-4 speeches while also defending those points at the same time. definitely not pointless.

      marmarAcum 8 luni
    • It's not about capitalism, and debates present arguments you cannot ignore

      King KazmaKing KazmaAcum 8 luni
  • Dang. I’m pretty early.

    Christopher WalkerChristopher WalkerAcum 8 luni
  • 420th ;)

    Hiroki HirayamaHiroki HirayamaAcum 8 luni